Крипто жөнгө салуу муссондогу жалтырак кол чатырга окшош - Op-Ed Bitcoin News

You know what they say, “when life gives you lemons, make lemonade.” But when it comes to protecting your crypto funds on centralized exchanges (CEXes), the old adage should be “when life gives you regulations, make a self-custody wallet.” Self-custody is undoubtedly a better solution for protecting the interests of customers in crypto. Regulation alone is not enough.

Төмөнкү пикирди редакциялык макала жазган Joseph Collement, General Counsel at Bitcoin.com.

Don’t get us wrong, regulation is important. It’s like a flimsy umbrella on a sunny day – better than nothing, but not something you want to rely on during a monsoon. Just ask the folks at Gemini, who despite being the “most regulated” CEX out there, still managed to lose all of their “Earn” customer money. Talk about “earn-ing” a bad reputation! Ouch.

Crypto Regulation is Like a Flimsy Umbrella in a Monsoon

But let’s be real here, the crypto world is like the Wild West. And let’s be honest, the U.S. Government is like the sheriff who just got to town, trying to make sense of this new frontier. They’re like the Dad at a teenage party, trying to understand what’s going on, but ultimately just getting in the way.

Working 5+ years full-time in crypto as a lawyer, I’ll dare to say that the problem with CEXes is not regulation (or the lack thereof), it’s the business model itself. When an entity takes control of customers’ funds, they’re incentivized to trade and gamble with that money, like a stockbroker playing blackjack with your retirement savings. Meanwhile, customers are left holding the bag (or in this case, the empty wallet) when things go south.

“Regulated” CEXes also commingle services such as trading, custody, and market making. Unlike on a traditional regulated stock exchange platform, users on many CEXes face-off against the exchange itself on a trade, as opposed to another client of the exchange. This gives CEXes the ability to trade ahead and against their customers, a well-known practice perpetrated by top-tier exchanges, even in the U.S.

And let’s not forget about hacking. To date, about $5 billion of users’ funds have been stolen in the past 3 years, with just under $3 billion just in 2022. But don’t worry, the DOJ is always here to protect you. With their massive blows to well known crypto criminal organizations like Bitzlato, they’ll make sure that your funds are safe.

Complying with regulation costs CEXes billions of dollars in revenue, and the cost is often passed onto the customer. CEXes are spending more money on legal and compliance than on product development. This month, Coinbase invested $50M in its compliance department as per a settlement with NYDFS but cut out 20% of its workforce. Lawyers are blockers not UX designers. And if you follow their advice blindly, you risk ending up with the good old cookie pop-up.

In all seriousness, self-custody is the way to go to protect your crypto funds. Honest business practices and non-custodial wallets are the key to protecting the interests of investors and customers in the crypto world. Instead of relying solely on regulations, let’s shift towards a more decentralized model, where users have full control over their own funds and are not at the mercy of centralized entities. Only then can we truly ensure the safety and security of users’ funds in the crypto world.

Бул окуяда Tags
бизнес-модель, Борборлоштурулган биржалар, сактоо, башкаруу, крипто, крипто дүйнө, crypto-custody, custodial wallets, кардарлар, ажыратылган, ethical business, funds protection, өкмөт, Hacking, салым, Investors, Джозеф Коллемент, укуктук, камакта эмес капчыктар, Opinion article, Пикир редакциясы, продукт иштеп чыгуу, жөнгө салуу, жобо, жөнгө салуучу климат, абийир, жоопкерчилик, киреше, коопсуздук, коопсуздук, Өзүн өзү камкордукка алуу, биржалык брокер, ишеним, user-controlled, Жапайы батыш

What are your thoughts on self-custody as a solution for protecting crypto funds? Do you agree that it’s a better alternative to relying solely on regulations, or do you think there’s a different approach that should be taken? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Конок Автор

Бул Op-ed макала. Бул макалада айтылган пикирлер автордуку. Bitcoin.com бул билдирүүдө келтирилген көз караштарды, пикирлерди же корутундуларды колдобойт жана колдобойт. Bitcoin.com Op-ed макаланын ичиндеги кандайдыр бир мазмун, так же сапат үчүн жооптуу эмес. Окурмандар мазмунга байланыштуу кандайдыр бир иш-аракеттерди жасаардан мурун өз алдынча текшерүү жүргүзүшү керек. Bitcoin.com түздөн-түз же кыйыр түрдө, бул Op-ed макаладагы кандайдыр бир маалыматты колдонуудан же ага таянуудан улам келип чыккан же келтирилген зыян үчүн жооптуу эмес.
Биздин Op-ed бөлүмгө салым кошуу үчүн op-ed (at) bitcoin.com дарегине сунуш жөнөтүңүз.

Image насыялар: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

баш тартуу: Бул макалада маалымат максатында гана болот. Сатып алуу же сатуу боюнча сунушту түздөн-түз сунуш кылуу же кандайдыр бир өнүмдөрдү, кызматтарды же компанияларды сунуш кылуу же жактыруу эмес. Bitcoin.com түзүп, салык, юридикалык же бухгалтердик пикирин бере албайт. Да, коом да, жазуучу менен шартталган себеп же болжолдонуп жаткан ар кандай жоготуу же бул макалада айтылган ар кандай мазмун, же кызмат боюнча же көз каранды пайдаланууга байланыштуу, түздөн-түз же кыйыр түрдө жооптуу болуп саналат.

Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/crypto-regulation-is-like-a-flimsy-umbrella-in-a-monsoon/